I've often felt that winning percentage is not a great look at how good coaches actually perform as it does not factor in a multitude of items including environment, player talent and competition. As a result I devised a formula to try and tackle some of that problem and give a more accurate portrayal of what part of the wins and losses the head coach was responsible for.
This metric, the adjusted win percentage for FBS coaches, tries to take into account at least the players that each coach is responsible for. For example when a new head coach wins in their very first year the credit only lies somewhat with them. Many of the players they are winning with were recruited by the previous staff. Often these coaches go on to not be successful in the long term. The best examples I can think of are Ed Orgeron at LSU or Gene Chizik at Auburn. Both should be noted actually had their best year a few years in, but neither lasted after a prolonged time. On the flip side new coaches often lose heavily in their first year because it takes time to recruit and install new systems and to get a full buy-in from players. Think Sabin's first year at Alabama or Bobby Petrino's first at Arkansas.
The basic thrust of the formula is this, the longer a coach has coached a team the more accountable he is for their wins and losses. The transfer portal has changed some of this in that the formula now holds coaches more accountable sooner. Gone are the days when you had four years to show some results.
Special notes, these statistics are based on fbs wins and losses only. The time period for the coaches is endless so all the coaches years are included, but it is only an evaluation of current coaches not coaches from the past.
We get to the fifth in our series the American Athletic Conference. The American was the 7th highest rated conference last season, but lost it's highest rated team in SMU. We'll see how the conference does without them. It certainly looks healthy though. Jon Sumrall leads the adjusted win percentage after two great years at Troy. Sumrall, the new coach at Tulane, has an adjusted win percentage of 85%. Also at the top are perennial contender Jeff Traylor (76%) at UTSA and former Houston and Texas head coach Tom Herman (65%) who is in his second year at Florida Atlantic. Full results are below.
| AAC Coaches | Team | W | L | W Pct |
| Jon Sumrall | Tulane | 17 | 3 | 85.0% |
| Jeff Traylor | UTSA | 35.5 | 11.5 | 75.5% |
| Tom Herman | FAU | 31.5 | 17.25 | 64.6% |
| Ryan Silverfield | Memphis | 27 | 16.5 | 62.1% |
| Jeff Monken | Army | 64 | 42.75 | 60.0% |
| Alex Golesh | USF | 3.5 | 3 | 53.8% |
| Mike Houston | East Carolina | 22 | 30 | 42.3% |
| Eric Morris | UNT | 2.5 | 3.5 | 41.7% |
| Brian Newberry | Navy | 2.5 | 3.5 | 41.7% |
| Kevin Wilson | Tulsa | 24 | 37 | 39.3% |
| Mike Bloomgren | Rice | 19 | 35.5 | 34.9% |
| Trent Dilfer | UAB | 2 | 4 | 33.3% |
| Biff Poggi | Charlotte | 1.5 | 4.5 | 25.0% |
| Stan Drayton | Temple | 4.5 | 13.5 | 25.0% |
Interested in AAC gear check this out:
Interested in 6 months free of Amazon Prime for Students:
