Since the college football playoff is ending it's time for out annual end of the year rankings for each conference. The ACC didn't rank as highly as we thought in the early season, but still finished with two teams in the college football playoff. As it turned the data showed that it should actually have been two other ACC teams in. The data also showed that two ACC teams that finished with stellar records were really just middle of the pack and one team that finished meh was actually one of the leagues better teams. The last thing we really noted in the ACC was the precipitous fall of Florida State.
It should be noted that each ranking is based on each teams body of work. Head to heads are not given an extra priority here. This means that even if a team beat another head to head they may still be ranked lower than the team they beat based on body of work. The best example from this year of this is Ohio State. The Buckeyes lost to Oregon earlier in the year, but in our evaluation we continued to believe Ohio State was really the better team. This played out in the playoffs.
 |
| Amazon Prime Gaming |
Clemson and SMU made the college football playoff, but the data tells us that Miami (FL) and Louisville were actually the better teams. Clemson averaged 11 points more than opponents this season against the 37th hardest schedule. They had two victories against top 25 opponents. SMU averaged 14 points more than opponents albeit against the 57th hardest SOS. They had just one victory against a Top 25 team.
Conversely Louisville averaged 12 more points per game than opponents so more than Clemson but fewer than SMU. Their SOS was 36th which was better than both of the teams that finished above them. They also had two top 25 wins. Miami beat opponents almost by an average of 19 points, better than other teams in the ACC. Their SOS was not great though at 56. The 'Canes also had two victories over top 25 teams this season.
c |
| College Football 25 for Xbox |
Neither Miami nor Louisville could have competed for a national title most likely, but the data shows that they were at least slightly better than the two teams who represented the ACC.
The data also pointed out to us a few teams who's record might not have truly represented their strength. Syracuse and Duke despite finishing 10-3 and 9-4 respectively are only ranked 8th and 9th in the conference in our power ranking whereas Virginia Tech, who finished 6-7, rates 5th.
 |
| Ohio State Hoodies |
Despite getting to 10 wins Syracuse's point differential was just 4.2 and their overall strength of schedule was just 63rd. That's the third easiest schedule in the ACC. The Orange did have some big wins, four top 25 wins according to the Aggregate's data, but they also seemed to play down to bad competition. Against three teams ranked 75th, 76th and 77th they went 2-1, but with an average point differential of 4 points. All three games were one possession. Often times when we see this type of data the team does not have nearly as good of record the next year, see Washington or Oklahoma State.
The other team that caught our attention this way was the Duke Blue Devils. Duke finished the season 9-4 in Manny Diaz's first year, but the data tells us they weren't quite as good as that record shows. Duke basically won every game it should have and lost every game it shouldn't. The lone exception on Duke's season was their victory over Virginia Tech. A team at that time that the Aggregate had rated as the 21st best team in the country. In Duke's four losses they lost by an average of 16 points to teams on average ranked 13th. In their 9 wins they won by an average of 9 points to teams ranked on average 82nd. So they won the games they should have, but what the data tells us is that if Duke had played a tougher schedule, such as some of their ACC brethren, their record would not have been near as good.
 |
| Gaming Chairs on Amazon |
Virginia Tech was the opposite of those preceding teams. We know that Hokies fans were not happy with this seasons results, but the data portends that things are going to be better even if Brent Pry hadn't made coaching changes. The Hokies data tells us that they were actually a pretty good team. They finished 26th nationally. Despite finishing 6-7 the Hokies still had a +6 point differential per game. In games they won they averaged winning by almost 20 points. In games they lost they averaged losing by less than 5. They lost twice in overtime. They only lost by two possessions twice and that was to the 11th ranked team and the 26th ranked team at those times.
The biggest disappointment in the ACC and honestly the country was Florida State. The Seminoles started the season ranked 8th in the Aggregate and they clearly had national championship aspirations, but State's season quickly devolved into "quicksand" as Shane Falco would have called it. The 'Noles finished the season 2-10 and dropped 81 spots in the Aggregate rankings. They lost by an average of almost 13 points against the 41st SOS. All of this combined does not bode well for Florida State's next season.
 |
| Notre Dame Beanie's |
| ACC Rankings |
| Rank | Team | Record | Conference | Rating | National Rank | Pre Season |
| 1 | Miami (FL) | 10-3 | 6-2 | 43.4 | 11 | 13 |
| 2 | Louisville | 9-4 | 5-3 | 39.4 | 12 | 26 |
| 3 | Clemson | 10-4 | 7-1 | 38.1 | 14 | 11 |
| 4 | Southern Methodist | 11-3 | 8-0 | 37.4 | 19 | 14 |
| 5 | Virginia Tech | 6-7 | 4-4 | 34.5 | 26 | 22 |
| 6 | Georgia Tech | 7-6 | 5-3 | 33.3 | 29 | 42 |
| 7 | Boston College | 7-6 | 4-4 | 30.7 | 39 | 45 |
| 8 | Syracuse | 10-3 | 5-3 | 27.6 | 49 | 24 |
| 9 | Duke | 9-4 | 5-3 | 27.4 | 50 | 54 |
| 10 | Pittsburgh | 7-6 | 3-5 | 27.2 | 52 | 67 |
| 11 | Virginia | 5-7 | 3-5 | 24.3 | 60 | 71 |
| 12 | North Carolina State | 6-7 | 3-5 | 22.4 | 63 | 32 |
| 13 | North Carolina | 6-7 | 3-5 | 21.9 | 65 | 39 |
| 14 | Wake Forest | 4-8 | 2-6 | 18.0 | 80 | 78 |
| 15 | Stanford | 3-9 | 2-6 | 17.6 | 83 | 91 |
| 16 | Florida State | 2-10 | 1-7 | 14.9 | 89 | 8 |
